![]() Pete Cornish will give you chapter and verse why they are shite and what they do in terms of tone suck when in a chain but switched off. Jester does basically the same, but about 4 times better. If you want Sloe Gin in a box, get a Jester. ![]() But, unfortunately, although its similar in topology (solid-state boost into valve overdrive into the solid-state buffer) to a BK Butler Tube Driver, thats where. I was excited to try the Reactivator as its an entirely new design for a tube pedal. If anyone wants mine, email me this is one of the staple Gilmour pedals, and it's still a very good pedal, yet I think they're crap compared to the Kingsley Jester, which is in another league. Over the past couple of weeks, Ive been testing out the new Reactovator pedal from Hagerman. Congrats on the BK Butler Kev, it's one I'll never sell! I feel that it's easier to get the "violin" tone with that particular tube. they will all be OK for use with this pedal. The 12AU7 also tames a little of the spikey-ness of the JJ 12AX7. Re: Does the BK Butler-Real Tube go with EU 230V PP2+ Post by JohnClark ยป Thu 6:45 pm I dont know why it is but for step down transformers appropriate for operating US Electronic Devices, 110, 117, and 120 is used interchangeably to describe the same thing. There is so much gain in these that you actually get a much more musical and usable range with the lower gain tube. Get a feel for the pedal with that tube but IMO I heard a DRAMATIC improvement in mine with a NOS JAN 12AU7. The tube inside appears to be a JJ ECC83 - is this a 12AX7? It arrived today!! I am looking at it now in my office - can't wait to get home and crank it up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |